Donnish
How we do itOur experienceAboutInsightsContact
Get started
Donnish - Australian software consultancy

Straight dealing in technology.

Services

  • Team Amplification
  • Ring-Fenced Teams
  • Procurement Consulting

Technologies

  • ReactJS
  • React Native
  • Flutter
  • .NET & C#

Company

  • Our Approach
  • Expertise
  • Contact

© 2024-2026 Donnish Pty Ltd. Based in Brisbane, Australia.

Privacy
Back to Insights
Procurement Advisory

What your Microsoft EA renewal actually costs you

14 April 2026|5 min read

Your Microsoft Enterprise Agreement renewal is probably the single biggest line item on your software budget. Most organisations negotiate 5-10% off the opening quote and consider it a win. That discount was already built into the vendor's opening position.

We work with Australian organisations on exactly these negotiations. The pattern is remarkably consistent. The vendor sends a renewal quote. Someone in IT or finance pushes back. The vendor offers a discount that looks generous in isolation. The deal gets signed. Nobody checks what the same vendor charges a comparable organisation in Amsterdam or Chicago for the same licences.

The NCE shift changes the game

Microsoft's New Commerce Experience has been reshaping enterprise licensing since 2022. Annual commitment pricing, monthly billing flexibility, and the push from perpetual licences to subscription models are all designed to simplify procurement. For Microsoft. Not necessarily for you.

The transparency is selective. Per-seat pricing for M365 is published. But your EA renewal is not a per-seat conversation. It includes volume commitments, Azure consumption targets, security add-ons, and compliance bundles that are all negotiated behind closed doors. The published price is the starting point, not the landing point.

Your reseller is not your negotiator. Your Cloud Solution Provider manages your tenancy, advises on renewals, and earns a margin on everything you buy. A lower price for you means a lower margin for them. When your CSP recommends a commitment level, ask yourself who that commitment benefits most.

What a benchmark comparison actually reveals

When we run a benchmark comparison on an EA renewal, we compare your vendor's quoted pricing against what equivalent organisations are paying globally for the same products and commitment levels. Not list price. Not published rates. Actual negotiated pricing from comparable deals.

The gap is almost always material. Across our engagements, the average saving against the vendor's opening position is 19.5%. On a $2 million annual EA, that's $390,000 per year. Same products. Same support. Same SLAs. The only difference is that someone showed up with data.

The "discount" you already negotiated is usually built in. Vendors expect pushback. They build the expected discount into their opening position. A 10% reduction on an inflated starting point is not a saving. It is the vendor arriving at the price they wanted all along.

Where the real savings sit

EA renewals are not just about per-seat pricing. The biggest savings come from three areas that most internal teams miss:

Licence rationalisation. Most organisations are paying for licences they do not use. E5 licences assigned to users who only need E3. Power BI Pro licences for people who never log in. Azure reserved instances that do not match actual consumption. A proper review of your licence estate before renewal typically reveals 10-15% of spend that can be eliminated immediately.

Commitment structure. Microsoft rewards commitment with discounts, but the structure of that commitment matters. Annual vs multi-year, consumption vs reserved, per-user vs per-device. The optimal structure depends on your usage patterns, growth trajectory, and risk appetite. Your vendor will recommend the structure that maximises their revenue. An independent advisor recommends the structure that minimises your cost.

Competitive leverage. Microsoft knows when your renewal window closes. They also know whether you have a credible alternative. If the answer is no, they have no incentive to move on price. Even if you are not planning to switch, the existence of a credible evaluation process changes the negotiation dynamic.

How this works in practice

We work with Adept Technologies, an independent procurement advisory firm with global pricing benchmarks across enterprise software vendors. The process is straightforward: we audit your current licence estate, benchmark your renewal quote against global pricing data, and negotiate on your behalf.

No upfront fees. Our fee is a percentage of verified savings only. If we do not save you money, you pay nothing. The audit itself is free and takes about two weeks.

If your EA renewal is coming up in the next 6-12 months, the best time to start is now. Not because of urgency tactics, but because benchmark comparisons and licence reviews take time to do properly. Starting early gives you negotiating leverage. Starting late means accepting whatever the vendor offers.

Take the assessment. Five questions. Two minutes. You will see exactly how your last discount compares to the 19.5% market benchmark. No obligation, no sales pitch. Just the numbers.

Sources: (1) Microsoft New Commerce Experience (NCE) pricing documentation, 2024-2025. (2) Adept Technologies benchmarking data, 2024-2025, based on enterprise licence negotiations across EMEA and APAC markets. Average savings of 19.5% against vendor opening positions. (3) "At What Cost? IT Pricing and the Australia Tax", Parliament of Australia, 2013.

Want to know what you should actually be paying?

Five questions. Two minutes. You'll see exactly how your last discount compares to the 19.5% market benchmark. No obligation, no sales pitch. Just the numbers.

Check your negotiation gap
All insights